Dragoman Digest
24 November 2023
New Delhi mulls decreasing EV import tariffs to woo Tesla
Reform would allow Tesla to tap into India’s nascent but high potential EV market
India is considering lowering tariffs on imported vehicles, aiming to persuade Tesla to invest in a local manufacturing plant. The government is contemplating a new tariff rate of 15 percent for all vehicles, sharply down from the current rate of 70 percent for vehicles valued at under US$40,000 and 100 percent for vehicles over US$40,000. Tesla made tariff reduction a precondition for setting up a factory in the country. Tesla is considering an initial investment of US$2 billion to establish a production hub serving both local and international markets.
India’s EV market is dominated by local player Tata Motors, which has a 70 percent share. Also present are entrenched Japanese automakers such as Suzuki which plans to export Indian-made EVs to Japan as early as 2025 and later to Europe. Suzuki believes the cost of manufacturing in India will allow it to compete with cheap Chinese-made EVs which in 2022 accounted for around 60 percent of global EV sales.
India’s EV industry has massive growth potential. Although just one percent of vehicles sold in India are EVs, uptake among its middle class of around 400 million people is growing rapidly. In the first half of 2023, EV sales increased sixfold year-on-year to 15,000. The central government has set a target to raise EV sales to 30 percent of all new car sales by 2030. For Tesla, its negotiations with India broadly mirror those that it has been undertaking with Indonesia, which has refused to jettison its 50 percent EV import tariff rate. The lure of the Indian auto market, now the world’s third largest, may prove too much for Tesla to pass up.
Washington sanctions Russian LNG supply for the first time
The Biden administration will be careful to avoid significant increase in global prices
The US has begun sanctioning exports from new Russian LNG projects, aiming to prevent Russia from re-directing stranded former EU pipeline gas flows. Early this month, Washington announced sanctions on exports from the Arctic LNG 2 project, located on the Gydan Peninsula in northern Russia. The sanctions affect France’s TotalEnergies and Japan Arctic LNG – which each hold 10 percent stakes and equivalent offtakes in the project – which would need to sell their holdings by January. Chinese state-owned companies CNOOC and CNPC also hold 10 percent stakes. The long arm of Washington’s sanctions generally forces any company with large exposure to the US to comply. The companies would have each received 1.98mn tonnes of LNG annually at the project’s full capacity. Arctic LNG 2 is expected to begin exporting LNG in Q1 2024. US officials have made clear that its new sanctions make a distinction between new Russian gas projects and those in which Western companies already have stakes such as Sakhalin-II (Mitsui, Mitsubishi and Shell) and Yamal LNG (TotalEnergies).
The sanctions will add further difficulties to Russia’s ambitions to supply 20 percent of the global LNG market by 2035. Europe, the destination for many gas pipelines out of Russia, has begun to cut its reliance on Russian gas following the invasion of Ukraine. Russia’s pipeline gas exports to the EU are projected to fall almost two thirds from 2022 to 2023. Attempts by Russia to promote a new pipeline to China – the Power of Siberia 2 – has run into difficulties due to China’s preference to increase supply from Qatar.
As with the price cap on Russian oil, the US will be attempting to thread the needle between curbing Russian LNG ambitions and preventing an increase in global market prices. Gas specialist Anne-Sophie Corbeau projects that the sanctions “will keep the markets a bit tighter for longer”. EU countries are under intense pressure to reduce consumer energy prices amid their decreased intake of Russian gas. The importance of Russian LNG in Japan and Europe’s energy security could prompt TotalEnergies and Japan Arctic LNG to seek exemptions from the sanctions.
Russian gas pipelines
Source: Financial Times, Petroleum Economist, Gazprom
Japan bets on solid state batteries to win EV market share
Feasibility of commercialising technology still subject to some doubt
Japanese companies are racing to commercialise and build a supply chain for solid state batteries, seeking to regain lost ground to China in the EV market. Solid state batteries contain a solid, rather than liquid, electrolyte which would theoretically double the range of and charge much faster than lithium-ion batteries. Toyota has had numerous technological breakthroughs and is leading the development of the technology. It aims to commercialise solid state batteries by the end of 2024 and begin selling vehicles with the batteries in 2027 or 2028. Toyota’s solid electrolyte is produced by Japanese petroleum company Idemitsu, while Japanese glass maker AGC is providing expertise in melting together materials for the electrolyte. Although Japan took an early lead in 2009 with the release of the Nissan Leaf – the first mass market EV – its global share has declined to just 5 percent.
Toyota will face significant hurdles in penetrating the EV market with solid state batteries. Solid state batteries will be more exposed to lithium prices, as they require up to 35 percent more lithium than current batteries. At this stage, they also cost four to 25 times more than lithium-ion batteries, partially due to their greater use of rare earths. The manufacturing process is intensely complex. The ability to mass produce materials for the battery at a high quality remains in question. These issues have led some to project solid state batteries will struggle to take 10 percent of the EV market by 2035.
South Korea and Japan team up to build global hydrogen and ammonia supply chain
Costs of generating and shipping fuel challenge viability
South Korea and Japan this month announced that they will jointly develop a hydrogen and ammonia supply chain. The countries will together invest in and procure hydrogen and ammonia from projects in locations such as the Middle East and the US until 2030. The plants will aim to feed low cost and stable energy supplies to the countries’ domestic industries. Japanese and South Korean companies have begun jointly developing hydrogen projects abroad, including Mitsubishi and Lotte Chemical’s 10-million-ton ammonia plant in the US and Mitsui and GS Energy’s 1-million-ton ammonia project in the UAE. The collaboration is one of several pillars in efforts to warm ties between the two countries under the Kishida and Yoon Suk Yeol governments, which have long been strained due to disputes over Japan’s colonial occupation of South Korea.
Both countries lack natural resources to generate energy domestically and are home to large energy-intensive industries. They hope hydrogen and ammonia will help facilitate a smooth transition, avoiding the need to deindustrialise or offshore heavy industry. There remain serious doubts about the fuel’s economic viability. Firing ammonia in coal-fired plants is projected to cost approximately US$260 per megawatt in Japan in 2030 – around double that of renewable energy. Hydrogen shipping costs are projected to be six times that of LNG due to challenges including the energy-intensity of liquefaction and regasification processes and a requirement to store the fuel below negative 253 degrees Celsius. Although bilateral cooperation on energy security is politically significant, it may not overcome the sketchy economics of procuring the fuels. Nevertheless, the sensitive nature of the partnership is significant in demonstrating the tangible steps of Japan-Korea rapprochement.